The result was keep. The added sources appear to meet notability concerns. Shimeru (talk) 00:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article is not encyclopedic. The product this article advertises is not well known and is not of any significance in the field it targets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koft (talk • contribs) 20:22, 23 May 2010
Keep. 23-may-2010, Elwood:
I disagree because:
Quote:
An encyclopedia (also spelled encyclopaedia or encyclopædia) is a comprehensive written compendium that holds information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge.
End quote.
http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Scala_(programming_language)
http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Visual_basic
http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/.net
http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/AMOS_(programming_language) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.145.134 (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
End, 23-may-2010, Elwood —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.80.148.37 (talk) 20:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article is an advertisement for a product, see http://amigaworld.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5442
"Hollywood now has its own entry at Wikipedia, the world's most popular encyclopedia. Here is the link so you can check it out: http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Hollywood (programming language). The article provides a good overview of what Hollywood can do, what platforms it supports, and a short history of the program. There is also a dedicated section about the popular Hollywood Designer add-on, which allows the easy creation of presentations and multimedia applications using a convenient GUI. Finally, I'd like to inform interested customers from overseas that the Euro is currently pretty weak in comparison to the US dollar, so for everyone who is thinking about purchasing Hollywood, now might be a good time to order." Koft (talk) 21:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I use it daily and dont know whats the problem with that wikipedia entry... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuxedo75 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see one person also mentions that Hollywood / Designer as a softwarepackage is not "important" enough to have its own page on Wikipedia. I'm a bit surprised to read such statement. I am the CEO of Ferrule Media, one company wich uses Hollywood / Hollywood Designer to develop commercial software used in the Norwegian schools and in dentistry / medical world. We have used Hollywood to develop for several year already, both in our Norwegian and Danish office.
The Hollywood/Designer-bundle is one of the most important software-packages available on the modern Amiga, and is well known among the Amiga community.
Best regards
Torgeir Vee,
CEO, Ferrule Media,
www.ferrule-media.no —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.109.184.154 (talk) 21:00, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
http://en.wikipedia.orghttps://demo.azizisearch.com/lite/wikipedia/page/Beamer_(LaTeX)
or can be at least used in the same way, as shown in this very, very basic example presentation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klY2VIFFCAU
Hollywood is a real cross platform multimedia language and the most important one on AmigaOS. As "Beamer" and especially, "Scala" (as mentioned above) are valid entries in wikipedia, for sure, this should be true for Hollywood, too.
I personally use Hollywood for presentations given at the Max-Planck Institute for Computer Science. I'm working there (see: http://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~tcrecel/) and Hollywood is very much appreciated!
regards,
Tom Crecelius —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.66.109.66 (talk) 17:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]