Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher-order control Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Higher-order_control

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 23:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Higher-order control

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, unable to find anything about it on Google, no sources, possible OR and POV. Jack (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced OR on a term that can have multiple meanings. Ray^Talk 03:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Control theory as a concept is used in sociology, for instance, a review article on "Control Theories in Sociology", Ann. Rev. Soc. and our Control theory (sociology) article. But this article doesn't seem to be using the term 'higher-order control' in the same sense as Power's approach noted in the review article. With no other references found, this seems like original research and a badly named article. --Mark viking (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The title of the article is very general, and could refer to lots of things. For this specific meaning it is not sufficiently notable, and other meanings are already covered elsewhere. a13ean (talk) 20:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.