Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Content Screening Informatics Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/High_Content_Screening_Informatics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 21:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

High Content Screening Informatics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and is a mess. Not even sure what the content is. Cynof Gavuf 09:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk Page: I added all pubmed refs that use phrase "high content screening" with informatics. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 12:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - looks to be a copyvio of [1]. Thryduulf (talk) 20:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into High-content screening. The article in question is "buzz word compliant" but contains little useful information. In addition to copyvio, the phrase "In this article we will give an overview of the considerations that should be kept in mind" which is a violation of WP:NOTGUIDE. Boghog (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 20:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 20:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing worth merging. Not even a neologism. DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Copyvio from http://www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/MB/article.asp?doi=b616187c Abductive (reasoning) 10:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyvio and notability issues. Angryapathy (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Copyvio issues as per the above, plus this phrase seems to be merely a synonym for bioinformatics (or a subset of information found in that article). Accounting4Taste:talk 17:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.