Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hierarchy of knowledge Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hierarchy_of_knowledge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to DIKW. v/r - T P 17:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hierarchy of knowledge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as unreferenced since 2009, and as original research since 2007. Searches reveal mostly mirrors to this article or unrelated topics. Ideas presented in this article appear to be entirely OR. George100 (talk) 19:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One could make something of it but the title is not a good one and we have the article Branches of science, which is better. See here for a source. Warden (talk) 22:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom or possibly redirect to Branches of science. Not exact, I know. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to DIKW. original research. —Ruud 10:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.