Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HelpMaticProHTML Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HelpMaticProHTML

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 17:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HelpMaticProHTML (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

NN software by NN parent company, contains no claim to notability within the field or even the genre, no references, zero non-advertising ghits Bullzeye ^{(Ring for Service)} 02:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 02:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I propose keeping the entry for now. This is a placeholder as I organize the information. This is my first initial entry, so I may need to add more information. --Dskirk (talk) 13:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You need reliable sources to show that this product is notable. It may simply be too new. -- Banjeboi 03:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 (talk) 01:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I do appreciate the feedback. The product has been available for almost a decade but it is never reviewed because its competition are big software products such as Robohelp and Doc-to-Help and others. I can find no articles of review, but I've learned a lot in this process so I thank you for your comments. I may make a fresh attempt at some future point if I can locate a reputable review. Thank you. --Dskirk (talk) 14:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I'm afraid notability really is negligible. I found nothing significant. Tim Ross (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.