Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 133600 Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HD_133600

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HD 133600 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• keep - object of study/paper. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: it's a close solar twin and so has appeared in a number of papers under the designation "HIP 73815". Praemonitus (talk) 23:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, just barely. The significant coverage of this star is marginally enough to pass WP:NASTRO criteria #2. I think, however, this information is more useful in a "list" article for so-called solar twins. Stubby individual articles just make it more difficult for interested readers to access such information. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.