Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HDFSFileTransfer Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HDFSFileTransfer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 01:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HDFSFileTransfer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The author has moaned about the deletion so I will give him the benefit of an AfD. Even if the copyvio position were fixed, this would be deletable as spam, as non-notable and being not an article but a user guide. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. 'Delete'; The author has copied and pasted material from the pages directly onto the article. SantiLak (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. 'Delete/Merge; Fails to establish context or notability—and it is unlikely to be able to meet them. Can probably be condensed into a two-line footnote in Apache Hadoop#Hadoop distributed file system. —Sladen (talk) 08:23, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- nothing but a user manlual/advertisement for a non-notable bit of software. Reyk _YO! 12:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.