Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groundwork Monitor Community Edition Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Groundwork_Monitor_Community_Edition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 01:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Groundwork Monitor Community Edition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (web). Google hits show only its own official website except some trivial information exist in other website. Furthermore, most information were copied from its subpage NAHID 07:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this as spam. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 10:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree—it reads like an advertisement. It's also an orphan. --AnnaFrance (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete spam, created by a likely SPA Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 17:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Appears to be spam/advert. TN‑X-Man 00:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per above. Trees Rock^MyGoal 01:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of cites and as likely spam.-- danntm ^T _C 20:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak move to Groundwork Monitor: Google search for "groundwork monitor" with the quotes but without "community edition" yields many sources, such as this and this. Current version incorporates verbiage from copyrighted website and so should be deleted; if somebody wishes to write a new article from scratch, then it should probably be titled "Groundwork Monitor." 69.140.152.55 (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.