Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grooscript Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grooscript

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Groovy (programming language)#Dialects. Once content has been merged, the page history must be kept in order to preserve attribution. czar 06:48, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grooscript

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable software library:

Not discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field. Not the subject of instruction at multiple grade schools, high schools, universities or post-graduate programs. Not the subject of multiple printed third-party manuals, instruction books, or reliable reviews. Not recognized as having historical or technical significance by reliable sources. No substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources. Mduvekot (talk) 22:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:15, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find only the barest mention of this outside the project itself, so if fails the WP:GNG. The infoq presentation reference also looks like it's by the library's author. - GretLomborg (talk) 06:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I created this article without understanding Wikipedia's criteria for notability. I now think because this software is relevant within the Apache Groovy ecosystem, its content should be added to Groovy_(programming_language). Not sure how to proceed. Aptasiiii (talk) 00:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge with Groovy (programming language) (as per article creator); insufficient notability for standalone article. Quis separabit? 02:22, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Relevant info from this article has been merged into Groovy (programming language) so this article can now be deleted. Aptasiiii (talk) 11:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.