Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphisoft EcoDesigner Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Graphisoft_EcoDesigner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to ArchiCAD. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Graphisoft EcoDesigner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 19:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Environment. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: absence of SIGCOV suggests this fails NSOFT. Owen× ☎ 22:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to ArchiCAD per IgelRM. Owen× ☎ 00:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to ArchiCAD [1] IgelRM (talk) 23:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.