Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Googlepedia (3rd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Googlepedia_(3rd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Googlepedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep (snow) It was already clear at the last AfD that there's at least four sources WP:Articles for deletion/Googlepedia (2nd nomination). That passes WP:GNG, so did the nom even check that? Widefox; talk 11:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete In point of fact, the 4 references cited in the 2nd nomination are (in order):404, one paragraph in a listicle, also 404, a very short Washington Post article that barely goes beyond "this exists". References have to be WP:V to contribute to GNG. A broken browser extension that ended support nine years ago has a hard time establishing notability even given WP:NOTTEMPORARY and this one doesn't. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete easy close needs better references. Not sure if this is even worth having a page on DeloreanTimeMachine (talk) 18:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.