Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genetic algorithm in Mechanical engineering Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Genetic_algorithm_in_Mechanical_engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus that WP:GNG is not met and that this article doesn't add anything significant to Genetic algorithm. I will happily userfy if someone wants to merge any content somewhere. TerriersFan (talk) 00:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genetic algorithm in Mechanical engineering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacks reliable sources and does not meet notability guidelines. Tinton5 (talk) 06:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep One would hope that WP:BEFORE covered fixing trivial syntactic errors that were hiding the two adequate academic refs already on this article.

There may be quality-based reasons for deleting this poor, unreadable article. There are probably reasons to merge it with our existing article on genetic algorithms in mechanical engineering (If we don't yet have one, we should have done long ago). There is no reason for claiming the topic to be non-notable, or the article unreferenced. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article doesn't add anything much to Genetic algorithm which is a solid, thorough piece of coverage. Author could add a short section on use of GA in mech. eng. to that articleChiswick Chap (talk) 16:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A merge to List of genetic algorithm applications would seem more appropriate than Genetic algorithm, but yes, that seems like a reasonable short-term response. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Comment Looking at the page history, this looks like yet another connected with WP:India Education Program/Courses/Fall 2011/Machine Drawing and Computer Graphics. Given how much writing I've already done for articles on their list, I feel I should be asking Pune for an honorary degree! Andy Dingley (talk) 16:58, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Chiswick Chap. I don't see anything here that would add to genetic algorithm, and I'm not sure that this article proposes a new implementation that would belong on the list of genetic algorithm applications. It's a content fork. I will admit that the sentence Genetic Algorithms are proving to be very useful in engineering design, manufacturing and other such applications because they are easy to use and they are likely do find globally, best design or solution, which is superior to any other design or solution makes me smile. I don't know why. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 07:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A promotional POV fork. Biophys (talk) 20:48, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.