Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Games API Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Games_API

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Games API (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this is notable enough. Wikipedia is not an API reference manual Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, and too transient to probably become notable in the future. W Nowicki (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. While there are a number of websites that mention Games API, such as this one, they do so only in passing, in the context of API in general. The first reference, duplicated in the body of the text, is from a blog and should not be regarded as a reliable source. The second reference does appear to be a reliable source, but this is insufficient to establish notability. Moreover, the phrase does not seem to be specific to Microsoft Windows. Here is a version by Betfair, and arguably one by Fupa. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.