Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galaxy groups and clusters Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Galaxy_groups_and_clusters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Galaxy groups and clusters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an improperly conceived disambiguation page. A disambiguation page is a collection of things that share the same title, for example Mercury (element), Mercury (planet) and Mercury (god). Per WP:DABCONCEPT, we do not have disambiguation pages compounding arbitrary divisions of the same type of thing, for example, "Roads in Spain and Portugal" directing readers to Roads in Spain and Roads in Portugal, or "Butterflies and French emperors" directing readers to Butterfly and Emperor of France, because neither individual topic by itself is commonly known by the combined name. Similarly, neither title on this page contains the phrase Galaxy groups and clusters, and therefore neither title is ambiguous to that phrase. I therefore propose to delete this page and redirect the title to Large-scale structure of the cosmos#Walls, filaments, and voids. bd2412 T 18:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the proposal says, this isn't a valid article, any more than having an article called "cats and dogs" with links to "cat" and "dog" would be. I don't know where to redirect it, possibly Observable universe#Large-scale structure. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Observable universe#Large-scale structure is fine. Actually, that is what I had intended to link to; the target I suggested redirects to approximately that section. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. If appropriate, add a {{distinguish}} hatnote on the articles. older ≠ wiser 11:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above, Boleyn (talk) 14:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not a valid disambig page. -- 101.119.14.73 (talk) 10:55, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.