Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GScript Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GScript

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Citing (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GScript (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable predecessor to Gosu, could just have its own section on the Gosu Article. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 18:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Request withdrawn WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 08:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 18:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, procedural keep that is. If basic facts are verifiable and there is a clear merge and redirect target, then AfD is the wrong venue for this. Considering alternatives to deletion is policy (see WP:ATD), and so boldly merging or starting a merge discussion should be attempted before proposing deletion. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 18:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.