Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fragmented distribution attack (2nd nomination) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fragmented_distribution_attack_(2nd_nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 12:56, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fragmented distribution attack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG for lack of secondary reliable sources coverage. It was kept at AfD 8 years ago in hoping sources would come, they did not. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! ^{Babymissfortune} 16:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be something made up in the conference presentation linked to in the article ("An attempt to define the Fragmented Distribution Attack"), and on which the article is entirely based, but which has since failed to gain traction and therefore fails WP:GNG.--Pontificalibus 21:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just found Intrusion detection system evasion techniques#Fragmentation and small packets which could be a suitable redirect target.Pontificalibus 09:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No references, ergo no article. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott (talk) 04:55, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - notability not established, possible redirect mentioned by Pontificalibus would seem okay too.--Staberinde (talk) 16:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.