Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forefront Protection for Exchange Server Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Forefront_Protection_for_Exchange_Server

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Microsoft Forefront. merge & redir DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Forefront Protection for Exchange Server

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 23:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. 23:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 23:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I believe this article about a discontinued software product lacks notability. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 21:55, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Codename Lisa, please disclose the competing antivirus company which you work for! I strongly suspect that to be the case. MS FPE is indeed a notable product, with many millions of seats licenced worldwide. It is not discontinued, it remains officially supported with malware/spam fingerprint database updates and potential security patches until April 2015, but no new software versions or new feature-adding service packs will be published from Sep 2012. This kind of "extroduction" from the market realistically gives current operators 1 to 1.5 years to move on to other Microsoft in-house offerings (typically Forefront Online Protection for Exchange a.k.a. the new Exchange Online Protection) or buy into solutions from any 3rd party IT-sec vendor. 87.97.99.95 (talk) 18:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Microsoft ForeFront as lacking sourcing, claim of notability and awards. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:53, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Microsoft Forefront as the previous speaker said. MountWassen (talk) 07:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.