Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleeman structure Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fleeman_structure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 05:17, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fleeman structure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original Research, COI Bhny (talk) 07:22, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable gobbledygook per WP:FRINGE. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as fringe babble. Not even wrong. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete Only occurrence of the term is in non-peer-reviewed self-publication by Fleeman. Dricherby (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No reliable sources. Jschnur (talk) 07:32, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.