Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast Fourier Transform Telescope Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fast_Fourier_Transform_Telescope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Astronomical interferometer#Modern astronomical interferometry. Sandstein 20:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fast Fourier Transform Telescope (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially non-notable technology. Notability template has been in place since 2008, and I'm not sure this subject qualifies for a standalone article. The New Scientist source appears to focus directly on the technology, but does not use the term "Fast Fourier Transform." Other sources mention the tech, but do not expand on it. Article appears to be based on a single paper written by the technology's creators. Other sources I located during WP:BEFORE mention individual telescopes using the technology, or mention the Tegmark & Zaldarriaga paper, but do not appear to provide significant coverage. Skeletor3000 (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Astronomical_interferometer#Modern_astronomical_interferometry, where it is mentioned and merge any refs needed for verification. This is a telescope proposal that never got much secondary coverage beyond press releases or signifcant uptake by the astronomical community--it is no Square Kilometer Array. But it is a published method for radio interferometry and the one sentence in the astronomical interferometer article seems OK as due weight. It is a reasonable search term. Hence redirect. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 23:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Thank you for that redirect suggestion. I've merged the independent coverage from the FFTT article to the Astronomical interferometer article. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.