Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fancy (programming language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fancy_(programming_language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fancy (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete No evidence of notability. No independent sources at all. PROD was contested. (By a strange error the PROD reason was given as "Not student project with no independent sources", but this was meant to say "Non-notable student project with no independent sources.") JamesBWatson (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG--Korruski^Talk 14:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - article created with request from WP:RA. Pomepl (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I don't quite see your point. Why is that an argument to keep?--Korruski^Talk 22:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No claim or evidence of notability. --Pnm (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nominator. Doesn't appear to be notable. Alas, we can't have an article for every project on github. bobrayner (talk) 04:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.