Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failure to build from source Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Failure_to_build_from_source

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Failure to build from source

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. A "failure to build from source" is exactly that: a failure to build a computer program from its source code. Little else can be said about this without original research; the only GBooks hit I get for this term is a glossary entry. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A simplistic dictionary definition. We don't need embedded Linux wikis inside Wikipedia. The existing ones do a fine job on their own. It looks like there are less than 40 Google hits for this phrase, which is not really a good sign for notability. For Linux content, one would expect to find sources online. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - seems pretty clear, per WP:NOTDIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.