Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extropy Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Extropy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Extropianism. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extropy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a neologism, and a fringe view as well. Fails notability and not a dictionary requirements. Also merge discussion has been open for 3 years. Jaque Hammer (talk) 03:23, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy redirect to Extropianism, please.—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 07:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• It appears that the page was already merged to Extropianism. Redirect and speedy close of this AfD seems appropriate. Cnilep (talk) 10:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.