Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extended Module Player Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Extended_Module_Player

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Module Player (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill, unsourced software. Just because software exists does not make it notable. Long lists of features does not make for an encyclopedic topic. Article is completely unsourced except for a link to the projects web page on sourceforge. To keep this article, it needs to address notability with more than just a google search showing hits. Multiple, reliable sources, independent of the subject providing non-trivial mention. Web reviews, blogs, appearance in directories do not count for non-trivial sources. Miami33139 (talk) 02:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unable to find sources other than those with trivial mentions. Radiant chains (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.