Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everything Operating System Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Everything_Operating_System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 20:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Operating System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable future software release. The only source in the article is a placeholder website set up by the developer. Further, the editor who created the page is also the developer of the software (although the page is not blatant advertising). —C.Fred (talk) 01:19, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

qqwe2:I am going to release soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qqwe2 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 02:03, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree with C.Fred. An article about this OS should not be created until it has received significant coverage by multiple sources. ȸ (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No evidence of attained notability. (That is unsurprising at this point in its development cycle, but WP doesn't include on the basis of hopes for the future.) AllyD (talk) 18:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• I wish there were a speedy deletion criterion for this. — Keφr 14:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - essentially unreferenced software article of unclear notability, lacking any coverage in independent reliable sources. A search turned up no RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 13:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.