Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escapade (programming language) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Escapade_(programming_language)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Escapade (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. The one external link provided is a dead link. Googling turned up nothing useful. Msnicki (talk) 14:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This has existed since December 2003 but has hardly gotten much better improvement and because of the name, searching is not easy but the best I seemed to find is this. Unless better can be found, I'm not seeing much. SwisterTwister talk 07:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No establishment of notability, no references, no improvements in a very long time. I can't find any working references (the one deadlink reference appears to have been archived by the Internet Archive either). Rwessel (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - For the sake of completeness, this article was recent restored to its current form, after having been reduced to an (inappropriate) redirect last December. I originally nominated that redirect at RfD Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_10#Escapade_.28programming_language.29. Rwessel (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.