Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy informatics Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Energy_informatics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Energy informatics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not dictionary. Jim Carter 11:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 12:56, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - this could be turned into a stub at least. Did you check out any sources on line?Bearian (talk) 15:20, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - given that there are entire university research centers dedicated to this topic, it would seem to deserve an article, albeit a better one than this one. PianoDan (talk) 15:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – A longstanding topic, although the term may be new. Before starting I said to myself that I would !vote Keep if there was a journal or conference. There is a Conference on Energy Informatics -- see ei2012 ei2014. Also this paper about the field. I think eventually it could become an article like Environmental informatics, which is more established. – Margin1522 (talk) 19:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.