Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embryo transfer technology:applications Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Embryo_transfer_technology:applications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted WP:A10 of Embryo transfer Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 15:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC) Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 15:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Embryo transfer technology:applications

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTESSAY. No decent sources to show why it's important, and Wikipedia is not a place for essays. Not my area of expertise, but seems like a WP:CONTENTFORK from another topic, and might be a candidate for speedy deletion as an A10. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete; not essay, WP:FORK/WP:OR of Embryo transfer —Мандичка^YO 😜 14:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's the article I was looking for. Couldn't find it, which is why I put it up for AfD not speedy. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.