Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Email loop Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Email_loop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Infinite loop#Multi-party loops. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:22, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Email loop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Email loops existed, and could even recur, but they are, essentially, a configuration error. I am not convinced that there is an encyclopaedic subject here though. The encyclopaedic subject is presumably email, or mail servers. What is on this page is almost entirely unsourced. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Internet. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Infinite loop#Multi-party loops, where email loops are discussed. This is an encyclopedic topic (see discussion in Clayton, Bronstein et al., Kosachev and Nemati, and this CBS News article) but the article fails the WP:NOT test of WP:GNG by violating WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH and WP:NOTHOWTO. I suggest we WP:TNT this article, redirecting it as noted above until it can be rewritten to address the problems. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks. I confirm I would be content with that. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Infinite loop as suggested above by Dclemens1971, where it is already mentioned under Multi-party loops. Prof.PMarini (talk) 09:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.