The result was Speedy Keep - Non admin close by nominator. Thanks in particular to The Anome - plenty of sources. Springnuts (talk) 20:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No Reliable Sources. The sources given are The Register and a non-Peer Reviewed self published paper by the technique's inventor ... hosted by the company who will sell you the software for $1499. There are few google hits, and these normally refer back to the Register article. Springnuts (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would regard the Reg as a reliable source in this particular context: most of their coverage is serious journalism, albeit mixed in with (generally clearly signalled) joke stories and provocations. This does not seem to be either of the latter. [On later review, after discovering the new cites found above: I think this is now a speedy keep, given the cites from multiple verifiable reliable sources. At least four academic papers from independent research groups, the public involement of a major police force, and mainstream tech media coverage, what else is needed?] -- The Anome (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]