Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EffiaSoft Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/EffiaSoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EffiaSoft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatantly fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. No coverage whatsoever. Created bypassing several AfC declines. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt - Clearly trying to promote there company, Seeing as they've ignored AFC anyway I'm assuming once (if) this gets deleted they'll then recreated this and it'll be one big merry-go-round so think Salting is also a good idea here. –Davey2010^Talk 22:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I've added a {{PROD}} on the spam attack vector. –Be..anyone (talk) 17:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software company article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in multiple sources. Most refs are incidental mentions, or not WP:RS, with the only exception being the siliconIndia link.Dialectric (talk) 02:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.