Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Displacement theory Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Displacement_theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 22:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Displacement theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Essay, every last word would have to be scrubbed away to begin making an encyclopaedia article. WilyD 14:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not an article, someone's unsourced personal essay. Edward321 (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. While (m)y main overall belief is that everything started from nothing and just wants to be nothing again. It is the fact that everything wants to be nothing that drives the universe surely is a moving and credible creed, this still seems to be original research to me. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:OR Salih (talk) 16:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Oh so very delete.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete If it can't be speedied Computerjoe's talk 19:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Essay is not a criterion for speedy deletion. (It was nominated, but I declined because there's no relevent criterion). WilyD 19:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Shame we can't G1 it :P. Well at the very least can this be snowballed? Computerjoe's talk 19:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Stop trying to rush. There's no rush. Let the process proceed normally. Uncle G (talk) 23:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • Indeed, there's nothing wrong with tardy deletion. WilyD 23:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Computerjoe's talk 19:36, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Nuke from orbit, scatter ash to winds. as per everything. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:OR -- Marek.69 ^talk 03:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is original research in the form of an essay. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.