Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discrete dipole approximation codes Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Discrete_dipole_approximation_codes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Discrete dipole approximation#Discrete Dipole Approximation Codes. Content has already been merged according to nom Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discrete dipole approximation codes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wrote this page originally together with another one: "Discrete dipole approximation". But I merged them together recently and extended table of codes. Therefore this page is obsolete and should be now deleted. I think it can be speedy deleted. Puncinus (talk)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect: I agree that the description of the method (DDA) and the codes are better together in a single page. But instead of deleting this page, I propose to make a redirect to Discrete_dipole_approximation#Discrete_Dipole_Approximation_Codes, as described in Wikipedia:Redirect. This will keep the existing links to this page operational. But I am not sure how exactly the redirect should be implemented (accompanied with removing content from this page) (User:Myurkin) —Preceding undated comment added 03:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Myurkin: I have explicitly marked your contribution as a redirect !vote in order this debate can continue in a regular manner. If at the end of the debate the closer determines the result should be a redirect they will likely do that; but in that instance if you need help refining that to a redirect to section then feel free to contact me on my page or ping me on the article page talk. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect If the content was merged, then per WP:MERGE, the page should be redirected to preserve attributions and history. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 17:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: I think it would be appropriate to redirect it to the DDA article if they are already merged. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.