Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digester (computing) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Digester_(computing)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Digester (computing)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged for lack of notability since September 2011 Shentino (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Googling confirms there's just nothing out there. Msnicki (talk) 22:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Hue Sat Lum 16:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU ^tp* 10:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reference is not a reliable source, no news hits, search results seem to just link to this page and the project page. No indication of importance whatsoever. Only the fact it is about software saves me from suggesting it gets speedy deleted as per A7 --Ritchie333 (talk) 11:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.