Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dialog (software) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dialog_(software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎ /IAR "Never even heard of it" is not a deletion rationale and sourcing has already been shown to exist. Let's not waste a week of community time Star Mississippi 22:46, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dialog (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Never even heard of it. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Computing, and Software. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Likely there are many things you haven't heard of (your recent edits demonstrate that), but notability was established by the 2nd and 3rd sources. TEDickey (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per the article's reference list, there's in-depth coverage in Linux Journal. I'm sure there have been other articles in the tech press though it's hard to search for them given the tool's very generic name. (If I have time I'll do some more digging and post back here.) —Psychonaut (talk) 20:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.