Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Linux Consortium Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Desktop_Linux_Consortium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Desktop Linux Consortium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

looks like a paid advertising article that hasn't been updated for a long time, maybe it should be merged with the article about Linux Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks like a short-lived group whose only purpose was to discourage the use of the controversial Lindows OS and when that got no real adoption, so did this group. It actually may be worth a short mention in Linspire#Criticism, but we might be in esoteric territory. Nate • (chatter) 23:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• It gets a few mentions in Infoworld's of years past, and in various books on Linux-based operating systems and companies, but there's not all of that much analysis of it in these sources. It's basically "Oh look! There's a Desktop Linux Consortium." news in the computer magazines, and "This company was in the Desktop Linux Consortium." elsewhere. Uncle G (talk) 23:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP: GNG. I could not find sources to establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete ,Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:49, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.