Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definitive Dimensions of Creative Architecture Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Definitive_Dimensions_of_Creative_Architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Definitive Dimensions of Creative Architecture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found this article with a WP:PROD template on it, but deletion has previously been contested so it can't be deleted without discussion. The prod reason was "no context / original research / no evidence of notability. Also no changes have been made since Jan 2010 when it was previously prodded". I agree. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Seems to be somebody's dissertation. Original research, no context, not fleshed out, sourced or likely to become an encyclopedia article. Acroterion _(talk) 23:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per previous nom "no context / original research / no evidence of notability". --Elekhh (talk) 23:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- This looks like the outline for somebody's essay. -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.