Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datability Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Datability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Datability (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that fails to satisfy NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore the sources used in the article barely discusses the subject of the article. The ref bombing is merely a mirage to induce a sense of notability whilst in actuality there isn’t any. Celestina007 (talk) 01:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 01:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete agree with nominator. No significant news coverage. Peter303x (talk) 02:16, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Author's question: would it make sense to work on an article on Penril, the company that bought them? (WP:Guide_to_deletion says: "If you wish to merge or copy material, it is preferable to offer a specific proposal in the deletion discussion") Pi314m (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By way of example, is this a possible start to a Penril article? Pi314m (talk) 01:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom Powerful Karma (talk) 07:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.