Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D (data language specification) Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/D_(data_language_specification)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

D (data language specification) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per the commentary at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Third Manifesto: when it was suggested that The Third Manifesto be merged into this article, I looked for sources about this data language and discovered that it too seems to fail WP:GNG. No matter what search terms I used, mostly combinations of the authors' names with "data language" and similar terms, I came up with no in-depth independent sources about this subject. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:08, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.