The result was Delete. No prejudice to recreation if sound references are found. Tyrenius (talk) 23:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An "American fine art photographer" (my emphasis), which for the uninitiated means that he takes care over his prints and offers them for sale at rather high prices. All well and good, but the article, written in a somewhat promotional style (and also idiosyncratically, with what are normally dependent clauses serving as full sentences) offers as sources for the claims only this or that page of dkeithfuron.com. True, there are three other "references". One of them, this, says that "Keith has authored and published six books among which the latest one has been nominated for the prestigious Pulitzer Award". If so, perhaps he did so under a different name: amazon.com lists plenty of books by Raymond Furon but none by Keith; and the Library of Congress catalogue also lists nothing. Of the other two references, one is to a retailer of Furon's works and the other doesn't even mention him. Furon's own site says a little about him but doesn't claim that he has either had a single solo exhibition or put out a single book (he's merely contributed to a single book); there's also no link there to critical discussion. Googling reveals the usual humdrum stuff (myspace, etc.), but (at least until my patience ran out) nothing substantial. Claims for notability aren't verifiable. -- Hoary (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]