Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CsrGetProcessId Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CsrGetProcessId

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CsrGetProcessId

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

API function are not of themselves notable, and this article does not assert the API function is anyway exceptional. Was a PROD but the article creators challanged. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. czar · · 14:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This function is part of the Native API for Microsoft WIndows. The API as a whole is notable, but the individual functions in the API usually are not. I haven't found anything beyond routine mentions in API references and snippets in tutorials. While there are numerous reliable sources out there, none are in-depth about the topic itself. The topic thus fails WP:GNG. If there are multiple in-depths sources I've missed, I'd be happy to change my recommendation. --Mark viking (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not independently notable. Also probably violates WP:NOTHOWTO.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 02:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.