Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative problem-solving Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Creative_problem-solving

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —VersaceSpace 🌃 13:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creative problem-solving (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hopefully extra sources can be found to keep this article, but in the meantime... Please consider whether this article meets WP:OR and whether independent sources support that it is separately notable to problem solving. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edward de Bono's work was the original impetus for this article. User:Fred Bauder Talk 12:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and expand. Andre🚐 05:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.