Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creately Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Creately

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creately

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously PRODed and de-PRODed but the new references are simply more of the same- almost all press releases in a niche market area. I can see nothing here which conveys notability despite the bets efforts of the company's own writers. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom: the sourcing is entirely WP:PRIMARY and neither independent, third-party, or reliable. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, and WP:PROMO is pretty blatent. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as advertising PR given the article naturally goes to specifications about the software and then the sources themselves simply being the expected activities such as the business talking about itself, events, financial and business activities. None of this actually substantiates anything close to substance. SwisterTwister talk 18:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.