Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contify Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Contify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contify

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a company that fails NCORP. Apart from a short article on ZDNet [1], there is no SIGCOV in reliable sources. The article has been edited by accounts like User:Marketing Contify and User:Ankur marketer. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom rationale Ealuscerwen (talk) 01:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Clearly fails WP:NCORP for insufficient coverage to merit inclusion. BD2412 T 03:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A company going about its business, recently announcing a mobile app, but participation in start-up events and the non-notable award listings which are summarised in the article are insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH, as is the brief ZDNet summary of the firm's proposition. Fails WP:NCORP and there is no article on the Athena Information Solutions parent, so no suitable redirect target. AllyD (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.