Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contextual analytics Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Contextual_analytics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 13:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contextual analytics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Significance of subject not properly established. The only reference in the article fails to mention "contextual analytics". Article not written in a tone that is easily understood. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete After looking at a few uses of "Contextual analytics" it is clear that different people are using the words in different ways. There is no clear definition, except that it is some form of data mining or perhaps the use of the results of data mining. Perhaps redirect to Datamining? But maybe that isn't a good idea, we'd have to include something like "contextual analytics has unclear meanings" in Datamining. Dingo1729 (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.