Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Construction and business development in Chicago Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Construction_and_business_development_in_Chicago

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Construction and business development in Chicago (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a presumably partial list (with no selection criteria stated) of construction permits and business licenses issued in Chicago during the first half of 2013, this seems to be nothing but an indiscriminate and unencyclopedic collection of data. See also WP:SALAT. Deor (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Wow, truly indiscriminate. I don't think I've ever seen such mundane information posted on WP. Delete per nom. postdlf (talk) 02:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:INDISCRIMINATE list: This page appears to be just a list of (selected?) very recent business openings and related government filings, with no indication that they are particularly significant. (Contrast with lists such as tallest buildings, mayors of major cities, etc.) Page does not have any substantial content other than the list. --Closeapple (talk) 04:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.