Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compile and go loader Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Compile_and_go_loader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:52, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Compile and go loader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced POV-article with just a few hits on Google Search (on the article title). Fails WP:GNG Night of the Big Wind _talk 23:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. A better title for the article is just "Compile and go", since the loading is just the last phase of a compile-and-go system (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL). As a search on the shorter title shows, this is a well-known concept in software technology. I don't see in what sense the article fails to present a neutral point of view, as it lists both advantages and disadvantages of compile-and-go schemes, but in any case being unsourced and POV are not by themselves reasons for deletion.  --Lambiam 09:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  --Lambiam 09:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  --Lambiam 09:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Someone added the missing sources. Diego (talk) 14:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Request speedy close as keep With the added sources it is clear that the article is not somebodies private opinion. Night of the Big Wind _talk 16:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.