Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of timer applications Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_timer_applications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 13:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of timer applications

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced list of non-notable (smartphone?) software applications. it seems to consist entirely of original research. - Mr X 22:40, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Per Wikipedia:CHANCE, you should wait at least week to see if there are sources to prove this article has notability. Frmorrison (talk) 13:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 07:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom as unsourced OR. The title says it all. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.