Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of tablet computers Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_tablet_computers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Father Goose (talk) 15:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of tablet computers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comparison of individual products/models. Wikipedia is not a catalog. This is an article that is perpetually out of date (somewhat relevant is WP:RECENT). An encyclopedia shouldn't duplicate a consumer electronics retailer's product comparison tool. Of course, if the point of the list is not to list current models but all tablet models, then the problem is WP:INDISCRIMINATE. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  20:24, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I agree that (part of) the list may already be a little out of date. However, many devices can still be attained from 2nd hand websites. The reason the article was made is not so much to list the commercial devices, but to allow people to compare these devices and pick the best (cheapest) option for them so that they can attain useful information trough it (ie via wikipedia). It wasn't made to compare the commercial devices an sich. KVDP (talk) 08:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • But Wikipedia is not a buying guide or a product comparison site. Allowing people to compare in order to pick the best is not a reason for keeping. --— Rhododendrites ^talk |  15:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This list serves a purpose. Enough for it, not to be deleted. Harsh (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • That it serves a purpose or is WP:USEFUL is an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. --— Rhododendrites ^talk |  15:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'm a programmer an often i need to use this list to know which tablets exist, and their specs such as width an height in pixels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.136.33.133 (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.