Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of proxifiers Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_proxifiers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of proxifiers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another indiscriminate linkfarm of software that is unlikely to be notable individually. It doesn't appear that any content here individually has an article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notable list entries. WP:NOTGUIDE WP:NOTLINKFARM and various other degrees of WP:NOT.
Comment The current article doesn't actually say why the subject is notable. Please expand it to explain that and it may have a chance of not being deleted.Accesscrawl (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.