Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of open-source programming language licensing Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_open-source_programming_language_licensing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of open-source programming language licensing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did a before search and I was unable to find any independent sources that compare the licensing of open-source programming languages. There are some sources that discuss different open-source programming languages, but not their licensing. Therefore, this list does not pass WP:SAL. (t · c) buidhe 04:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 04:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I've been doing research in this ballpark for the open-source license and free license articles and have not come across any coverage of the topic. A quick search of websites and journals doesn't show anything. I think it may also be inherently misleading. Without an explanation of "implementation license", a reader could easily mistake these licenses for having some kind of impact on the generated software's license. Without sources, an explanation of "implementation license" would fall under WP:OR. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 06:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I would like to see multiple reliable sources make this comparison but that is missing. Dympies (talk) 11:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.